It's been a while.
I've mostly been listening to some old vinyl I bought for pretty cheap but never really knew too much about. This isn't one of them (I'd listened to the song all the way through a few times before, and I'd definitely listened to Jethro Tull) - but I still found it on vinyl for a $4.99. Not bad, eh?
For a 43:46 minute long song, this captivates extremely well. There is not one part of this entire song I dislike. The entire piece keeps throbbing and pulsing for the whole album - the song itself feels alive. I especially love how it has variations to keep you interested, but it keeps returning to one main theme - no change in the song is ever random or unnecessary. It is still one whole song as opposed to a compilation of different ones played in a row (as some unmentioned longer songs sometimes feel).
Give it a listen, PLEASE. It's really a beautiful piece as a whole (Although it's not possible to listen to it all the way through on vinyl. The record has to be flipped over at some point. I still recommend trying to hear the whole thing all the way through, if you can possibly sit still for that long).
(Is this an album or a song review?)
Showing posts with label classics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label classics. Show all posts
Monday, February 11, 2013
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Modern: Where Are We Now? 9/10
THIS.
Bowie comes out with a new single celebrating his 66th birthday.
Yes. I did just say that.
Happy goddamn birthday, David Bowie, and thank you so much.
This song is the definition of classic Bowie; that same bittersweet melody, that same characteristic voice we've all grown up with and loved forever. It is so impressive to see an artist performing with the same talent that he did years and years ago (as so many try and fail to do so today). With "Where Are We Now?", David Bowie proves he (and his music) is timeless.
Once again, Bowie delivers. (For the first time in a decade, should I add? We don't know what else he's been doing, but he definitely hasn't lost his touch in any way at all.)
Eagerly awaiting The Next Day, available March 8, 2013 (or the 12th in the U.S.).
Bowie comes out with a new single celebrating his 66th birthday.
Yes. I did just say that.
Happy goddamn birthday, David Bowie, and thank you so much.
This song is the definition of classic Bowie; that same bittersweet melody, that same characteristic voice we've all grown up with and loved forever. It is so impressive to see an artist performing with the same talent that he did years and years ago (as so many try and fail to do so today). With "Where Are We Now?", David Bowie proves he (and his music) is timeless.
Once again, Bowie delivers. (For the first time in a decade, should I add? We don't know what else he's been doing, but he definitely hasn't lost his touch in any way at all.)
Eagerly awaiting The Next Day, available March 8, 2013 (or the 12th in the U.S.).
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Classics: Little Queen 8/10
Well my goodness.
Yes, I did buy this album because of Barracuda. It's so rare to hear a song with such powerful
vocals from a female singer, and I wanted more...but I ended up with MUCH more
than bargained for when I found it on vinyl for $3 and gave the whole thing a
go.
So I'll start with Barracuda - I know it is just one of
those songs that everyone knows, but it is that ridiculously famous for a good reason. The driving beat of the guitar holding the
song together combined with Ann Wilson's fierce voice are intimidating to
listen to, and it is surprising to hear a song so rough from two female
musicians. I also usually don't listen
to music for the vocals, but Ann Wilson has unexpectedly good range to add to
her powerfully threatening voice. Yes,
it's a good song; yes, you hear that everyday from everyone you know; and yes,
I'm telling you that too.
Onto the rest of the album: there's no track that is as much
of a driving force as Barracuda, but the whole album still displays the talent
of the Wilson sisters. Love Alive
displays again Ann's versatility as a singer as her style shifts to relaxed and
quiet - and she still manages to sound original and display her range. She doesn't just yell her songs; she can
murmur them softly too. The rest of the
instrumental parts fit ridiculously well together - the guitar is delicately
played and has a much more polished sound then the roughly played repeated
chords of Barracuda, and it harmonizes deliciously with the bass as the drums
take the lead towards the end of the song.
Props to this album as a whole also for it's use of unconventional
instruments (such as flute and mandolin) giving the whole thing a medieval,
almost minstrel-like twist to a rock album - something I've never heard before
and probably won't hear again. Dream of the Archer holds onto the unconventional medieval feel with it's delicate vocal
harmonies and focus on the mandolin; Kick it Out reverts to the hard rock
running feel of Barracuda with Ann going back to her louder, fiercer vocals and
the lower guitar part with mild distortion. Little Queen has a more modern funk style with the focus on the bass and
the dissonant clash between the two guitar parts, while Treat Me Well feels
like a slow jazz-y song you would hear in a smoky bar late at night. The album ends on a solid note with Go On
Cry, a final display and return to Heart's hard rock style shown in their first
track. I especially love this: how they
begin and end the album in the same style, when everything in between differs
so heavily. They still manage to wrap
all of Little Queen together.
In short,
Heart plays with a lot of different styles and uses Ann's versatile voice and
the talent of each musician to their advantage in this album. I love the upbeat feel and the contrast
between each song but how each still manages to be beautiful in it's own way. This album may be ridiculously centered on
Ann Wilson's voice, but it is deservedly so as she has a voice to be respected
that one doesn't come by on every album.
8/10 not necessarily because this is such a great album, but
because it was so unexpectedly
amazing, and proves Heart's ridiculously versatile talents.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Classics: Blind Faith 8/10
I'll admit it - I had only heard of Blind Faith this summer,
and it was only because of the controversial cover of this album, but after
looking into them a little more and finding out my third favorite guitarist of
all time (Eric Clapton) was part of their band, I decided to buy this on vinyl
and test it out.
I wasn't surprised - after all, most of Clapton's bands have
the same focus on the blues-y guitar parts and his characteristic impressive high
vocals used throughout Blind Faith. This
isn't necessarily a bad thing - Blind Faith holds onto all the good things like
the jazz influence on the improvisational guitar solos and the repetitive
steady bass riffs holding the songs together .
Good album, points off for the lack of creativity, but even typical
blues rock rides above most music. Nice
to listen to when just relaxing - I especially love listening to how each
factor of each song fits together: the lead and background vocals harmonize,
the drum parts are consistent and hold the songs together without being boring
(credits to Ginger Baker, I feel like any drummer would've had fun playing most of the
album), and although there is a definite focus on the guitar, the bass still
gets it's spotlight occasionally (e.g. Had to Cry Today). I especially love Do What You Like as it
showcases each instrument with bass and drum improvisational solos to be
remembered - it may seem to drag after a while, but picks up again and finishes
strong, earning it's place on a very good album.
(apologies in advance for crediting most of this album to Eric Clapton: I hadn't listened to the other band members extensively before this album so most of this review is focused on Clapton's style and how Blind Faith is similar or dissimilar. Just want to give credit to the rest of the members, and especially to Steve Winwood for writing most of the songs)
(apologies in advance for crediting most of this album to Eric Clapton: I hadn't listened to the other band members extensively before this album so most of this review is focused on Clapton's style and how Blind Faith is similar or dissimilar. Just want to give credit to the rest of the members, and especially to Steve Winwood for writing most of the songs)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

